<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									Sh2-129 Flying Bat and OU4 Giant Squid Nebulae - Images				            </title>
            <link>https://vtastro.org/community/images/sh2-129-flying-bat-and-ou4-giant-squid-nebulae/</link>
            <description>vtastro.org Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 18:23:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>RE: Sh2-129 Flying Bat and OU4 Giant Squid Nebulae</title>
                        <link>https://vtastro.org/community/images/sh2-129-flying-bat-and-ou4-giant-squid-nebulae/#post-924</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2024 14:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[@terri Thanks, Terri!  I had an additional 13 hours of data I collected with the OSC 2600MC using Ha/OIII and SII/Hb narrowband filters, but I didn&#039;t get the &#039;pop&#039; on the Squid when I combin...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@terri Thanks, Terri!  I had an additional 13 hours of data I collected with the OSC 2600MC using Ha/OIII and SII/Hb narrowband filters, but I didn't get the 'pop' on the Squid when I combined the (separated) OSC color data with the narrowband (SHO) data.  I just decided to use the SHO data I was able to bring out the Squid much more.  Although, to be honest, the OSC + Narrowband data really didn't look all that bad and may even look a little more 'natural'. (See attached starless image using data from 3 of the 7 sessions - preliminary processing.)  I might take another crack at combining all the OSC and Narrowband data from all 7 sessions, which would give me over 20h of data.</p>
<p>I had to enhance the data for the Squid using masks, since it's relatively dim and (as you said) I only had about 8 hrs of OIII narrowband data on it which, for this target, is really very little.</p>
<p>Not sure if I want to take the time to go back to it right now. I may wait until later in the summer when it's a bit higher and may try to collect more strictly narrowband data.</p>
<p>Greg</p>
<div id="wpfa-2261" class="wpforo-attached-file"><a class="wpforo-default-attachment" title="HOO2_OSC_SHO_comb_Sess1-4_WebRed_VAS.jpg" href="//vtastro.org/wp-content/uploads/wpforo/default_attachments/1717943853-HOO2_OSC_SHO_comb_Sess1-4_WebRed_VAS.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><i class="fas fa-paperclip"></i> HOO2_OSC_SHO_comb_Sess1-4_WebRed_VAS.jpg</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://vtastro.org/community/images/">Images</category>                        <dc:creator>Greg Erianne</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://vtastro.org/community/images/sh2-129-flying-bat-and-ou4-giant-squid-nebulae/#post-924</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>RE: Sh2-129 Flying Bat and OU4 Giant Squid Nebulaebest,</title>
                        <link>https://vtastro.org/community/images/sh2-129-flying-bat-and-ou4-giant-squid-nebulae/#post-923</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2024 14:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hi Greg, beautiful capture of a tough object!   You’ve captured it with a fairly short set of exposures.   Cameras are getting better all of the time!
Best,
Terri]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg, beautiful capture of a tough object!   You’ve captured it with a fairly short set of exposures.   Cameras are getting better all of the time!</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Terri</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://vtastro.org/community/images/">Images</category>                        <dc:creator>Terri Zittritsch</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://vtastro.org/community/images/sh2-129-flying-bat-and-ou4-giant-squid-nebulae/#post-923</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Sh2-129 Flying Bat and OU4 Giant Squid Nebulae</title>
                        <link>https://vtastro.org/community/images/sh2-129-flying-bat-and-ou4-giant-squid-nebulae/#post-916</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2024 02:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[The nebulae Sh2-129 (Flying Bat Nebulaand OU-4 (Giant Squid Nebula) are about 2300 light years (ly) away in the Constellation Cepheus.
Sh2-129 is formed by emission of ionized hydrogen gas ...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nebulae Sh2-129 (Flying Bat Nebulaand OU-4 (Giant Squid Nebula) are about 2300 light years (ly) away in the Constellation Cepheus.</p>
<p>Sh2-129 is formed by emission of ionized hydrogen gas (Ha) and is shown in red in the image, while OU-4 is formed by emission of ionized oxygen gas (OIII) and is shown in blue/cyan in the image. </p>
<p>At the center of OU-4, which is believed to be about 100,000 years old, is a very bright triple star system called HR 8119.  Multiple bow shocks can be seen alluding to the mechanisms that formed its complex shape. Some theorize that this is a planetary nebula (PN), but its size of about 50 ly is atypical for PN which are usually 1-3 ly (or less) in diameter.  OU-4 is quite a beautiful, but very dim, nebula.  I’ve enhanced/brightened it somewhat in order to be able to appreciate its complex structure against the backdrop of Sh2-129.</p>
<p>Capture Dates: 5/24, 5/25, 5/31, and 6/4/24</p>
<p>Askar 107PHQ with 0.7x reducer (fL = 524mm)<br />ASI2600MM Pro (Monochrome camera)<br />ZWO 7-position 2" Electronic Filter Wheel (EFW)<br />ZWO AM5 mount with guiding via SV106 and ASI178MM</p>
<p>Filters:<br />Antlia 3nm Narrowband OIII 2": 98×300″ (8:10)<br />Antlia 3nm Narrowband H-alpha 2": 25×300″ (1:20)<br />Antlia 3nm Narrowband SII  2": 25×300″ (:20)</p>
<p>Total Integration: 9:50 </p>
<p>All light frames were calibrated with dark, flat, and bias frames<br />Pre- and post-processed in PixInsight<br />Additional post-processing in Photoshop for exposure adjustments and generation of reduced size jpeg</p>
<div id="wpfa-2260" class="wpforo-attached-file"><a class="wpforo-default-attachment" title="Sh2-129_FlyingBat_Squid_HOOWebRed_VAS.jpg" href="//vtastro.org/wp-content/uploads/wpforo/default_attachments/1717899375-Sh2-129_FlyingBat_Squid_HOOWebRed_VAS.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><i class="fas fa-paperclip"></i> Sh2-129_FlyingBat_Squid_HOOWebRed_VAS.jpg</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://vtastro.org/community/images/">Images</category>                        <dc:creator>Greg Erianne</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://vtastro.org/community/images/sh2-129-flying-bat-and-ou4-giant-squid-nebulae/#post-916</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		