Well, I thought I was finally out of patience after processing this image all weekend (see previous post) without having success integrating my SII/Hb...

@maura-kelley Very nice work teasing that out of your data, Maura! Great image. Greg

@terri Well, you got some great data from it, Terri. What did you use to stretch, GHS or something else? Greg

@terri That looks like a great choice to have imaged in TX, Terri. It’s a bit too low on our horizon to image here (we’ll, at least my tree-lined hor...

@terri Beautiful image, Terri! Greg

@Terri I see the difference here at home, Terri. I like the contrast in yours better. Lost just a bit of the peripheral nebulosity around the outsi...

@terri Thanks, Terri! I’m on my phone right now (over my granddaughters’) and can’t really see the image well enough to see differences. I’ll take a l...

@terri Thanks for having a look and for the suggestion, Terri. Which colors do you think need to be enhanced with additional time on target, the Ha, ...

I decided to take another crack at getting a little more nebulosity in the image. Seemed like a lot of work to fill things out just little, but I thi...

@peter-gillette Thanks so much, Peter! I think what's bugging me is that I seem to have lost some of the nebula structure that I had in the BW (Ha) i...

@terri This was actually a test of the 0.7x reducer for the 107PHQ. I didn't intend on getting much out of it besides examining the star distortion, b...

@terri Very nice image, Terri! Looks great even with the limited time and the dust around the Iris looks terrific. Greg